跳到主要导航 跳到搜索 跳到主要内容

UK bill could prompt biodiversity loss

  • Sarah Durant
  • , Nathalie Pettorelli
  • , Tim Blackburn
  • , Jonathan Baillie
  • , Geoff Boxshall
  • , Stuart Brooks
  • , Chris Carbone
  • , Timothy Coulson
  • , Jennifer Crees
  • , Andrew Cunningham
  • , Mike Daniels
  • , Stefanie Deinet
  • , John Ewen
  • , Kevin Gaston
  • , Richard Gregory
  • , Matt Hayward
  • , David MacDonald
  • , Georgina Mace
  • , Robert May
  • , Ken Norris
  • Stuart Pimm, Dave Raffaelli, Steve Redpath, William Sutherland

科研成果: Letter同行评审

5 引用 (Scopus)

摘要

The UK government's proposed Infrastructure Bill for England and Wales gives new powers to control or eradicate invasive, non-native species (see go.nature.com/kbkvtt). However, what constitutes such a species needs careful definition to ensure that any use of these powers is beneficial for conservation.

The draft bill defines non-native species as those that are “not ordinarily resident in, or a regular visitor to, Great Britain”. This definition covers past native species that are now extinct, species that may become naturally established under a changing climate, and species listed in Schedule 9 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act. That list contains native species, including some that have been reintroduced into the wild, such as the barn owl (Tyto alba), capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus), chough (Pyrrhocorax pyrrhocorax) and red kite (Milvus milvus). The legislation could also preclude future species reintroductions, a tool to counter biodiversity loss.
源语言English
页(从-至)253-253
页数1
期刊Nature
512
7514
DOI
出版状态Published - 21 8月 2014

联合国可持续发展目标

此成果有助于实现下列可持续发展目标:

  1. Life on land
    Life on land

指纹

探究 'UK bill could prompt biodiversity loss' 的科研主题。它们共同构成独一无二的指纹。

引用此