The interplay between economics, legislative power and social influence examined through a social-ecological framework for marine ecosystems services

科研成果: Article同行评审

21 引用 (Scopus)
80 下载量 (Pure)

摘要

In the last 15 years, conservation has shifted increasingly towards perspectives based on the instrumental value of nature, where what counts is what provides benefits to humans. The ecosystem services framework embraces this vision of nature through monetary valuation of the environment to correct market failures and government distortions that hinder efficient allocation of public goods, including goods and services provided by biodiversity and ecosystems. The popularity of this approach is reflected in different countries legislation; for
instance, US, EU and UK have introduced economic criteria for comparing costs and benefits of environmental policies in protecting ecosystem services.
From an operational perspective, the ecosystem services framework requires ecologists to estimate how the supply of services is affected by changes in the functionality and/or the extent of ecosystems; and economists to identify how changes in the supply affect the flow of direct and indirect benefits to people. However, this approach may be simplistic when faced with the complexity of social-ecological systems. We investigated this for three different marine services: assimilative capacity of waste, coastal defense and renewable energy. We find that economic valuation could provide efficient and fair allocations in the case of assimilative capacity, but leads to social clashes between outputs generated by cost benefit analysis and citizens’ expectation in the case of coastal defense. In the case of renewable energy, controversies can be generated by regulatory mechanisms that are not necessarily aligned with the interests of industry or important social groups. We conclude that there is a need to integrate perspectives arising from utilitarian allocation of resources with those
involving legislation and communal values in order to reconcile conflicting interests and better sustain marine social-ecological systems
源语言English
期刊Science of the Total Environment
早期在线日期15 9月 2018
DOI
出版状态E-pub ahead of print - 15 9月 2018

联合国可持续发展目标

此成果有助于实现下列可持续发展目标:

  1. Affordable and clean energy
    Affordable and clean energy
  2. Industry innovation and infrastructure
    Industry innovation and infrastructure
  3. Climate action
    Climate action
  4. Life below water
    Life below water
  5. Life on land
    Life on land

指纹

探究 'The interplay between economics, legislative power and social influence examined through a social-ecological framework for marine ecosystems services' 的科研主题。它们共同构成独一无二的指纹。

引用此