TY - JOUR
T1 - Problematising the ‘Career Academic’ in UK construction and engineering education
T2 - does the system want what the system gets?
AU - Pilcher, Nick
AU - Forster, Alan
AU - Tennant, Stuart
AU - Murray, Mike
AU - Craig, Nigel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 SEFI.
PY - 2017/4/3
Y1 - 2017/4/3
N2 - ‘Career Academics’ are principally research-led, entering academia with limited or no industrial or practical experience. UK Higher Education Institutions welcome them for their potential to attain research grant funding and publish world-leading journal papers, ultimately enhancing institutional reputation. This polemical paper problematises the Career Academic around three areas: their institutional appeal; their impact on the student experience, team dynamics and broader academic functions; and current strategic policy to employ them. We also argue that recent UK Government teaching-focused initiatives will not address needs to employ practical academics, or ‘Pracademics’ in predominantly vocational Construction and Engineering Education. We generate questions for policy-makers, institutions and those implementing strategy. We argue that research is key, but partial rebalancing will achieve a diverse academic skill base to achieve contextualised construction and engineering education. In wider European contexts, the paper resonates with issues of academic ‘drift’ and provides reflection for others on the UK context.
AB - ‘Career Academics’ are principally research-led, entering academia with limited or no industrial or practical experience. UK Higher Education Institutions welcome them for their potential to attain research grant funding and publish world-leading journal papers, ultimately enhancing institutional reputation. This polemical paper problematises the Career Academic around three areas: their institutional appeal; their impact on the student experience, team dynamics and broader academic functions; and current strategic policy to employ them. We also argue that recent UK Government teaching-focused initiatives will not address needs to employ practical academics, or ‘Pracademics’ in predominantly vocational Construction and Engineering Education. We generate questions for policy-makers, institutions and those implementing strategy. We argue that research is key, but partial rebalancing will achieve a diverse academic skill base to achieve contextualised construction and engineering education. In wider European contexts, the paper resonates with issues of academic ‘drift’ and provides reflection for others on the UK context.
KW - Career Academic
KW - construction and engineering education
KW - professional industrial experience
KW - recruitment policy
KW - REF and TEF
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85017011597
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85017011597#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1080/03043797.2017.1306487
DO - 10.1080/03043797.2017.1306487
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85017011597
SN - 0304-3797
VL - 42
SP - 1477
EP - 1495
JO - European Journal of Engineering Education
JF - European Journal of Engineering Education
IS - 6
ER -