Resumen
Two contrasting models to facilitate the sharing of digital educational resources available for Higher Education are reviewed. The first model is based upon a low-input / open-access format that identifies, reviews then integrates digital resources taken from the global open educational resources pool into a course structure. New resources are added where required and the totality is contextualised for the specific current curriculum requirements. The second model is based upon a membership system linking global schools in any subject but trialled in dentistry to create, structure and curate a common pool of digital educational resources. The models selected have their roots in common initial goals but have chosen different routes to structure and fund their development in their search for sustainability. The models are contrasted and compared in terms of ease of use and contextualisation, and some general lessons for further OER development are drawn.
| Idioma original | English |
|---|---|
| Páginas (desde-hasta) | 17-23 |
| Número de páginas | 7 |
| Publicación | Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice |
| Volumen | 2 |
| N.º | 2 |
| DOI | |
| Estado | Published - 15 jul 2014 |
ODS de las Naciones Unidas
Este resultado contribuye a los siguientes Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible
-
Quality education
Huella
Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Two models for sharing digital open educational resources'. En conjunto forman una huella única.Perfiles
-
Frank Rennie
- UHI North West and Hebrides - Emeritus Professor of Sustainable Rural Development
- Sustainability Studies
Persona: Academic - Research and Teaching or Research only
Citar esto
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver