Ir directamente a la navegación principal Ir directamente a la búsqueda Ir directamente al contenido principal

Conservation practice could benefit from routine testing and publication of management outcomes

  • William J. Sutherland
  • , Roger Mitchell
  • , Jessica Walsh
  • , Tatsuya Amano
  • , Malcolm Ausden
  • , Trevor J.C. Beebee
  • , David Bullock
  • , Mike Daniels
  • , James Deutsch
  • , Richard A. Griffiths
  • , Stephanie V. Prior
  • , Tony Whitten
  • , Lynn V. Dicks

Producción científica: Article › revisión exhaustiva

18 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Effective conservation requires a step change in the way practitioners can contribute to science and can have access to research outputs. The journal Conservation Evidence was established in 2004 to help practitioners surmount several obstacles they face when attempting to document the effects of their conservation actions scientifically. It is easily and freely accessible online. It is free to publish in and it enables global communication of the effects of practical trials and experiments, which are virtually impossible to get published in most scientific journals. The driving force behind Conservation Evidence is the need to generate and share scientific information about the effects of interventions.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)1-3
Número de páginas3
PublicaciónConservation Evidence
Volumen10
EstadoPublished - 2013

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Conservation practice could benefit from routine testing and publication of management outcomes'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto