Tweeting birds: online mentions predict future citations in ornithology

Nina Jayne O'Hanlon, Tom Finch, Steve Dudley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

31 Citations (Scopus)
232 Downloads (Pure)


The rapid growth of online tools to communicate scientific research raises the important question of whether online attention is associated with citations in the scholarly literature. The Altmetric Attention Score (AAS) quantifies the attention received by a scientific publication on various online platforms including news, blogs and social media. It has been advanced as a rapid way of gauging the impact of a piece of research, both in terms of potential future scholarly citations and wider online engagement. Here, we explore variation in the AAS of 2677 research articles published in 10 ornithological journals between 2012 and 2016. On average, AAS increased sevenfold in just five years, primarily due to increased activity on Twitter which contributed 75% of the total score. For a subset of 878 articles published in 2014, including an additional 323 ornithology articles from non-specialist journals, an increase in AAS from 1 to 20 resulted in a predicted 112% increase in citation count from 2.6 to 5.5 citations per article. This effect interacted with journal impact factor, with weaker effects of AAS in higher impact factor journals. Our results suggest that altmetrics (or the online activity they measure), as well as complementing traditional measures of scholarly impact in ornithology such as citations, may also anticipate or even drive them.
Original languageEnglish
Article number171371
Number of pages11
JournalRoyal Society Open Science
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2017


Dive into the research topics of 'Tweeting birds: online mentions predict future citations in ornithology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this