Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Survey Methods: How Planning Practitioners Use Them, and the Implications for Planning Education

  • Meadhbh Maguire

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article is concerned with two aspects of how planning practitioners use survey-derived data; how planners integrate the limitations of survey questionnaires into practice, and the prevalence of such data within planning. Using a web survey (n = 201) and interviews (n = 18) of Canadian municipal planners, I find that survey data are heavily relied on, but many planners do not seem to be aware of cognitive biases when designing surveys, and those that are, have little knowledge of how they ought to mitigate them. To develop planners’ understanding of these biases and improve the survey data they collect, quantitative methods courses within planning curricula could respond by expanding beyond statistical analysis to incorporate survey design and “the total survey error approach” of survey methodology.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)605-618
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Planning Education and Research
Volume44
Issue number2
Early online date11 Sept 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2024

Keywords

  • bias
  • data collection
  • planning education
  • planning practice
  • quantitative methods
  • survey methods

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Survey Methods: How Planning Practitioners Use Them, and the Implications for Planning Education'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this