TY - JOUR
T1 - Stopping marine debris at the source
T2 - Effectiveness of Source Reduction Plans in Australia
AU - Serra-Gonçalves, Catarina
AU - Lavers, Jennifer L.
AU - Fischer, Andrew M.
AU - Tait, Heidi L.
AU - Bond, Alexander L.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank the volunteers and partners across Australia who contributed valuable data from thousands of beach debris clean-ups that contribute to the Australian Marine Debris Initiative Database. We want to thank all the organisations that helped implementing the SRPs and contributed with data; Mandurah Senior High School, Surfrider Foundation Australia WA, University of Western Australia Students, Cape to Cape Catchment Group, Boranup Board Riders, Keep Australia Beautiful Council (KABC) WA, Ocean Cleaner zh, All Saints College, Outdoor Discoveries. We are grateful to the Tangaroa Blue Foundation staff who facilitated the ‘ReefClean – Ditch the Flick’ SRP – Brett Tait, Kara-mae Coulter-Atkins, Craig Turner, Varsha Balu, Daniel Greenwood, Isabelle Loxton, and the volunteers who supported them, along with the Queensland Country Bank Stadium staff and management without who, this SRP would not have been possible. We are especially grateful to Tangaroa Blue Foundation. We appreciate Peter Puskic knowledge and support provided on the current manuscript. This research was funded by the Tasmania Graduate Research Scholarship. Additionally, we thank anonymous reviewers for providing feedback on earlier versions of this manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors
PY - 2023/7/24
Y1 - 2023/7/24
N2 - Globally, single-use plastics (i.e., items only used once before being discarded plastic, such as straws, plastic bags, cigarette butts) are a substantial contributor of debris in the environment. In response, policy interventions to minimise single-use plastics and packaging have increased in the past decade (e.g., national and state level bans on plastic bags). Reduction strategies that tackle debris items at the source (i.e., Source Reduction Plans (SRPs)) have been suggested as a key strategy to achieve a reduction in debris in the environment. SRPs differ in their implementation approach, since different items require different methods depending on their characteristics, pathway, and source. In Australia, several SRPs have been applied by communities and the Tangaroa Blue Foundation (TBF). Globally, there is a lack of information available concerning the challenges associated with the implementation of SRPs, such as policy considerations and costs. Therefore, there is a need to measuring the effectiveness of specific SRPs as mitigation tools, to identify their strengths and weaknesses, and determine the best reduction approaches for specific items. We measured the effectiveness of two quantifiable SRP projects at different scales: cigarette butts (consumer level) and strapping bands used in fisheries (industrial level). There was a marginally significant decline in strapping bands in the environment over time (2004–2020), although we were unable to associate this directly to the SRP intervention (ban on ships). At a consumer level, there was a decline in the rate of cigarette butts flicked on the ground during sporting events post-SRP, with an overall reduction of 45.4% in number of cigarettes per spectator. Our results suggest the outcomes differ depending on the type of SRP, due to the different characteristics of the tackled item (i.e., source, pathway) and the respective SRP implementation mechanism. We highlight the importance of SRPs and make recommendations on future steps towards reducing single-use plastics in the environment.
AB - Globally, single-use plastics (i.e., items only used once before being discarded plastic, such as straws, plastic bags, cigarette butts) are a substantial contributor of debris in the environment. In response, policy interventions to minimise single-use plastics and packaging have increased in the past decade (e.g., national and state level bans on plastic bags). Reduction strategies that tackle debris items at the source (i.e., Source Reduction Plans (SRPs)) have been suggested as a key strategy to achieve a reduction in debris in the environment. SRPs differ in their implementation approach, since different items require different methods depending on their characteristics, pathway, and source. In Australia, several SRPs have been applied by communities and the Tangaroa Blue Foundation (TBF). Globally, there is a lack of information available concerning the challenges associated with the implementation of SRPs, such as policy considerations and costs. Therefore, there is a need to measuring the effectiveness of specific SRPs as mitigation tools, to identify their strengths and weaknesses, and determine the best reduction approaches for specific items. We measured the effectiveness of two quantifiable SRP projects at different scales: cigarette butts (consumer level) and strapping bands used in fisheries (industrial level). There was a marginally significant decline in strapping bands in the environment over time (2004–2020), although we were unable to associate this directly to the SRP intervention (ban on ships). At a consumer level, there was a decline in the rate of cigarette butts flicked on the ground during sporting events post-SRP, with an overall reduction of 45.4% in number of cigarettes per spectator. Our results suggest the outcomes differ depending on the type of SRP, due to the different characteristics of the tackled item (i.e., source, pathway) and the respective SRP implementation mechanism. We highlight the importance of SRPs and make recommendations on future steps towards reducing single-use plastics in the environment.
KW - Community science
KW - Plastic debris
KW - Reduction strategies
KW - Single-use plastics
KW - Source Reduction Plan
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85166620112&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85166620112&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105776
DO - 10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105776
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85166620112
SN - 0308-597X
VL - 155
JO - Marine Policy
JF - Marine Policy
M1 - 105776
ER -