Offshore pipeline decommissioning: scale and context

Sally Rouse, Peter Hayes, Ian M Davies, Thomas Wilding

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)
179 Downloads (Pure)


The spatial extent of human activities must be understood for consistent and proportionate regulation, and effective marine planning. Redundant offshore pipelines can be removed or left in situ, but data on the footprint of these options are not readily available. The extents of three North Sea in situ decommissioning scenarios are presented. Leaving pipelines in situ would occupy <0.01% (12.3 km2) of UK waters, and this was similar to, or smaller than, other regulated activities (e.g. aggregate extraction). Adding armouring to large pipelines occupied up to 95 km2, while creating fisheries exclusion zones occupied up to 1119 km2. Removal of pipelines >30″ would be required to regain 50% or more of the seabed currently occupied. At present, the technology to remove pipelines >16″ safely and cost-efficiently is untested for large-scale decommissioning projects. The summaries presented inform the debate over the significance of decommissioning, and the regional consequences of different options.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)241-244
Number of pages4
JournalMarine Pollution Bulletin
Issue number1
Early online date27 Feb 2018
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 27 Feb 2018


  • Marine spatial planning
  • decommissioning
  • Pipelines
  • Oil and gas
  • Fishing
  • North Sea


Dive into the research topics of 'Offshore pipeline decommissioning: scale and context'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this