Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

My land? Your land? Scotland? Understanding sectoral similarities and differences in Scottish land use visions

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)
238 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Understanding agreement and differences between land use visions forms a first step for assessing and comparing alternative pathways towards a sustainable future. This study presents an analysis of 20 semi-structured interviews with representatives of the principal land use sectors in Scotland. The aim was to understand what, in their ideal vision, they would want rural Scotland to look like in 2050. Inductive content analysis was used to identify similarities and differences amongst interviewees. There was general agreement on the following: the importance of the environment; the wish for more partnerships, dialogue and collaboration; the desire for society to be more engaged and aware about land use; and a strong need for short-, medium- and long-term policies
helping to achieve these goals. The most notable differences relate to land ownership and governance. The outcomes form a basis for further facilitated discussions, emphasising common ground and exploring where, how and to what degree land use sectors can prepare and plan in the light of uncertainties posed by Brexit and climate change. The method was effective for understanding commonalities and differences between stakeholder groups and is transferable to other countries or regions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalRegional Environmental Change
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Feb 2018

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action
  2. SDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goals
    SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'My land? Your land? Scotland? Understanding sectoral similarities and differences in Scottish land use visions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this