Abstract
This qualitative process evaluation investigated learning from stakeholders (patient representatives, art managers/artists, clinicians
and commissioners) involved in a co-produced cultural commissioning grant scheme. The scheme was devised as a mechanism to
foster learning between, and within, stakeholder groups and to embed co-production in decision-making in clinical commissioning.
The evaluation included respondents (n = 36) from four stakeholder groups in three sequential stages. Findings identified themes centred on outcomes, learning, co-production, and cultural and political change, specifically that stakeholder roles need to be clearly defined and understood and that co-production takes a significant time commitment. Co-production in innovative projects is both complex and challenging. However, despite this, involving stakeholders has benefits for service design and the clinical commissioning process.
and commissioners) involved in a co-produced cultural commissioning grant scheme. The scheme was devised as a mechanism to
foster learning between, and within, stakeholder groups and to embed co-production in decision-making in clinical commissioning.
The evaluation included respondents (n = 36) from four stakeholder groups in three sequential stages. Findings identified themes centred on outcomes, learning, co-production, and cultural and political change, specifically that stakeholder roles need to be clearly defined and understood and that co-production takes a significant time commitment. Co-production in innovative projects is both complex and challenging. However, despite this, involving stakeholders has benefits for service design and the clinical commissioning process.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1-20 |
Number of pages | 20 |
Journal | Practice |
Volume | 1 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 6 Sept 2019 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 6 Sept 2019 |
Keywords
- Co-production
- commissioning
- arts
- health
- Qualitative methods