Abstract
This article serves as a rebuttal to McLeod et al’s criticism of Ó Giollagáin and Caimbeul’s ‘Moving Beyond Asocial Minority Language Policy’ article in this journal, while also offering an analysis of McLeod et al’s disapproving viewpoint of the conclusions and recommendations in Ó Giollagáin et al’s The Gaelic Crisis in the Vernacular Community (2020). This rebuttal argues for the inclusion of the threatened first-language Gaelic vernacular community in Gaelic policy, as well as the integration of the protection of Gaelic communities in official Gaelic promotion – minority language promotion with language community protection. McLeod et al’s contribution to the debate on the Gaelic vernacular crisis is essentially a collective effort to reinforce the relegation of the Gaelic crisis within official language promotion in Scotland and to promote a reinvigorated status quo.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 122 |
| Number of pages | 132 |
| Journal | Scottish Affairs |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 10 Feb 2022 |
Keywords
- Gaelic culture
- language policy and planning
- Sociolinguistics
- language ideology
- language minoritisation
- Language policy reform
- Language and culture
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Including the Threatened First-language Gaelic Vernacular Community in Gaelic Promotion and Protection: A Rebuttal to McLeod et al.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver