Genetic evidence challenges the native status of a threatened freshwater fish (Carassius carassius) in England

Daniel L. Jeffries, Gordon H. Copp, Gregory E. Maes, Lori Lawson Handley, Carl D. Sayer, Bernd Hänfling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A fundamental consideration for the conservation of a species is the extent of its native range, that is, regions naturally colonized. However, both natural processes and human-mediated introductions can drive species distribution shifts. Ruling out the human-mediated introduction of a species into a given region is vital for its conservation, but remains a significant challenge in most cases. The crucian carp Carassius carassius (L.) is a threatened freshwater fish thought to be native to much of Europe. However, its native status in England is based only on anecdotal evidence. Here, we devise an approach that can be used to empirically test the native status of English fauna. We use this approach, along with 13 microsatellite loci, population structure analyses, and Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC), to test hypotheses for the origins of C. carassius in England. Contrary to the current consensus, we find strong support for the human-mediated introduction of C. carassius into England during the 15th century. This result stimulates an interesting and timely debate surrounding motivations for the conservation of species. We discuss this topic, and the potential for continued conservation of C. carassius in England, despite its non-native origins.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2871-2882
Number of pages12
JournalEcology and Evolution
Volume7
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2017

Keywords

  • Approximate Bayesian Computation
  • introduced species
  • land bridge
  • microsatellites
  • postglacial recolonization

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Genetic evidence challenges the native status of a threatened freshwater fish (Carassius carassius) in England'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this