Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Forest pests in 21st century Britain: a review of impacts and management

  • Katrina Dainton
  • , Max Blake
  • , Gail Jackson
  • , Henry Creissen
  • , Fiona Burnett
  • , Mariella Marzano

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

Abstract

Threats to trees and forests from insect pests are increasing as a result of the globalization of trade and climate change. Impacts are greatest when insects attack hosts lacking evolutionary resistance. Preventing the establishment of new, non-native forest pests—defined here as insect species posing economic or ecological risks to trees—and reducing damage from existing ones is essential for sustaining forest ecosystem services, including timber production, carbon sequestration, and biodiversity. This study provides a comprehensive assessment of forest pests in Britain, identifying 56 pest species of concern. Fifteen are native, while the remainder originate from mainland Europe (27), Asia (10), North America (9), and Australia (1). A structured scoring system showed pest pressure continues to rise through increasing detections, but more recently detected pests are not necessarily more damaging than those detected earlier. Key drivers of pest establishment and impact included trade, climate, and tree stress. Forest management acted as both a driver of pest problems and a mitigator of damage. Pine, spruce, and oak experienced the greatest pest pressures. Two beetles—the native large pine weevil and the non-native great spruce bark beetle—were classified as having very high impact. Ten additional pests were rated high impact affecting both conifer and broadleaf hosts under varied management regimes. Most species (44) were scored as low to medium impact under current conditions, although several have caused substantial damage historically, in other regions, or under different environmental or management conditions. Native and non-native species occurred across all impact categories. Only 4 pests were intensively managed, and 7 routinely managed; the remaining 45 species received minimal or no management effort. Five species were identified as potentially under-managed relative to their impacts, highlighting opportunities to better align management effort. Overall, forest pest management in Britain only partially aligned with Integrated Pest Management (IPM) and Sustainable Forest Management principles, relying heavily instead on natural regulation. This emphasizes the need to embed core IPM practices to prevent further pest establishment, reduce damage, and strengthen long-term forest resilience under future environmental changes.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbercpag061
JournalForestry
Volume99
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Sept 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 2 - Zero Hunger
    SDG 2 Zero Hunger
  2. SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
    SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
  3. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
    SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
  4. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action
  5. SDG 15 - Life on Land
    SDG 15 Life on Land
  6. SDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goals
    SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals

Keywords

  • Climate Change
  • Global trade
  • Great Britain
  • Integrated Pest Management
  • Sustainable Forest Management
  • Tree Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Forest pests in 21st century Britain: a review of impacts and management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this