TY - JOUR
T1 - Factors moderating the relative effectiveness of varenicline and nicotine replacement therapy in clients using smoking cessation services
AU - Walker, Neil J
AU - Gainforth, Heather
AU - Kiparoglou, Vasiliki
AU - Robinson, Hayley
AU - van Woerden, Hugo C
AU - West, Robert
N1 - This is the peer reviewed version of the article. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.
PY - 2017/8/13
Y1 - 2017/8/13
N2 - Aims
To assess how far the greater effectiveness of varenicline over nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) is moderated by characteristics of the smokers or setting in clinical practice.
Design
We used observational data from 22,472 treatment episodes between 2013 and 2016 from smoking cessation services in England to assess whether differences between varenicline and NRT were moderated by a set of smoker and setting characteristics: these included level of social deprivation, age, gender, ethnic group, nicotine dependence, and treatment context. From the above, 15,640 episodes were analysed in relation to 4-week quit and 14,273 episodes at 12 weeks. All two-way interactions involving pharmacotherapy were fitted in addition to the main effects and a parsimonious model identified using a backwards stepwise selection procedure.
Findings
At both follow-up points, varenicline was associated with higher success rates overall (p<0.001 at both 4 and 12 weeks; adjusted odds ratio varenicline vs NRT = 1.82 [95%CI 1.61, 2.06] and 2.58 [95%CI 2.26, 2.94] at 4 and 12 weeks respectively). At 12 weeks, the relative benefits of varenicline were found to be influenced by the setting in which advice was provided (p<0.001 for interaction pharmacotherapy × setting; adjusted OR for varenicline × pharmacy setting = 0.53, [95% CI 0.42, 0.69] and for varenicline × General Practice setting = 0.79, [95% CI 0.64, 0.98] against a baseline of 1 for varenicline × community setting). The same trends were evident at 4 weeks but this did not translate to statistical significance. There was inconclusive evidence for moderating effects of other variables.
Conclusions
Varenicline use is associated with higher smoking cessation rates than nicotine replacement therapy in routine clinical practice, irrespective of a wide range of smoker characteristics, but the difference is less in certain intervention settings, most notably pharmacy but also GP practice, compared with community setting.
AB - Aims
To assess how far the greater effectiveness of varenicline over nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) is moderated by characteristics of the smokers or setting in clinical practice.
Design
We used observational data from 22,472 treatment episodes between 2013 and 2016 from smoking cessation services in England to assess whether differences between varenicline and NRT were moderated by a set of smoker and setting characteristics: these included level of social deprivation, age, gender, ethnic group, nicotine dependence, and treatment context. From the above, 15,640 episodes were analysed in relation to 4-week quit and 14,273 episodes at 12 weeks. All two-way interactions involving pharmacotherapy were fitted in addition to the main effects and a parsimonious model identified using a backwards stepwise selection procedure.
Findings
At both follow-up points, varenicline was associated with higher success rates overall (p<0.001 at both 4 and 12 weeks; adjusted odds ratio varenicline vs NRT = 1.82 [95%CI 1.61, 2.06] and 2.58 [95%CI 2.26, 2.94] at 4 and 12 weeks respectively). At 12 weeks, the relative benefits of varenicline were found to be influenced by the setting in which advice was provided (p<0.001 for interaction pharmacotherapy × setting; adjusted OR for varenicline × pharmacy setting = 0.53, [95% CI 0.42, 0.69] and for varenicline × General Practice setting = 0.79, [95% CI 0.64, 0.98] against a baseline of 1 for varenicline × community setting). The same trends were evident at 4 weeks but this did not translate to statistical significance. There was inconclusive evidence for moderating effects of other variables.
Conclusions
Varenicline use is associated with higher smoking cessation rates than nicotine replacement therapy in routine clinical practice, irrespective of a wide range of smoker characteristics, but the difference is less in certain intervention settings, most notably pharmacy but also GP practice, compared with community setting.
KW - smoking cessation
KW - NRT
KW - arenicline
KW - epidemiological study
KW - treatment effectiveness
U2 - 10.1111/add.14004
DO - 10.1111/add.14004
M3 - Article
SN - 1522-2683
JO - Addiction
JF - Addiction
ER -