TY - JOUR
T1 - Exploring rural Scottish GPs’ migration decisions
T2 - a secondary qualitative analysis considering burnout
AU - Latham, Helen Ann
AU - Maclaren, Andrew S.
AU - De Kock, Johannes H.
AU - Locock, Louise
AU - Murchie, Peter
AU - Skea, Zoë
N1 - © The Authors, This article is Open Access: CC BY 4.0 licence
PY - 2025/3/1
Y1 - 2025/3/1
N2 - Background The challenges of recruiting and retaining rural GPs are well described. UK data suggest high levels of burnout, characterised by detachment, exhaustion, and cynicism, plays a role in GP turnover. The contrast is engagement with work. There is limited evidence examining the relationship between work engagement and recruitment and retention in rural areas. Aim To qualitatively investigate GPs decisions to move or stay in rural areas through exploring areas that can promote work engagement. Design and setting This was a secondary analysis of qualitative data with Scottish GPs. Method A secondary analysis of 44 semi-structured interviews with GPs from across Scotland was undertaken. Data were analysed thematically and the Areas of Worklife Scale was used to structure data. Results Factors associated with burnout were identified and experienced as barriers to moving or staying rurally. Fear of dealing with pre-hospital emergency cases, clinical isolation, and rural training were concerns. Personal factors such as lack of partner employment played a key role in migration decisions. Factors associated with engagement were identified and experienced as facilitators for moving or staying rurally. Professional networks reduced professional isolation and rural GPs valued increased autonomy and time. Many felt being a rural GP was more aligned with their professional values and highly valued the rural lifestyle for themselves and their families. Conclusion Our data suggest that factors associated with engagement and burnout can contribute to rural GPs’ migration decisions. We highlight four areas that could promote desirable work environments by mitigating burnout and promoting engagement at work.
AB - Background The challenges of recruiting and retaining rural GPs are well described. UK data suggest high levels of burnout, characterised by detachment, exhaustion, and cynicism, plays a role in GP turnover. The contrast is engagement with work. There is limited evidence examining the relationship between work engagement and recruitment and retention in rural areas. Aim To qualitatively investigate GPs decisions to move or stay in rural areas through exploring areas that can promote work engagement. Design and setting This was a secondary analysis of qualitative data with Scottish GPs. Method A secondary analysis of 44 semi-structured interviews with GPs from across Scotland was undertaken. Data were analysed thematically and the Areas of Worklife Scale was used to structure data. Results Factors associated with burnout were identified and experienced as barriers to moving or staying rurally. Fear of dealing with pre-hospital emergency cases, clinical isolation, and rural training were concerns. Personal factors such as lack of partner employment played a key role in migration decisions. Factors associated with engagement were identified and experienced as facilitators for moving or staying rurally. Professional networks reduced professional isolation and rural GPs valued increased autonomy and time. Many felt being a rural GP was more aligned with their professional values and highly valued the rural lifestyle for themselves and their families. Conclusion Our data suggest that factors associated with engagement and burnout can contribute to rural GPs’ migration decisions. We highlight four areas that could promote desirable work environments by mitigating burnout and promoting engagement at work.
KW - burnout
KW - general practice
KW - professional
KW - recruitment
KW - retention
KW - rural health services
KW - Scotland
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85219460930&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85219460930&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3399/BJGP.2024.0494
DO - 10.3399/BJGP.2024.0494
M3 - Article
C2 - 39778942
AN - SCOPUS:85219460930
SN - 0960-1643
VL - 75
SP - e187-e194
JO - British Journal of General Practice
JF - British Journal of General Practice
IS - 752
ER -