TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluating the Feasibility and Acceptability of a Prototype Hospital Digital Antibiotic Review Tracking Toolkit
T2 - A Qualitative Study Using the RE-AIM Framework
AU - Colquhoun, Gosha
AU - Ring, Nicola
AU - Smith, Jamie
AU - Willis, Diane
AU - Williams, Brian
AU - Kydonaki, Kalliopi
N1 - © 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
PY - 2025/6/30
Y1 - 2025/6/30
N2 - Background: Internationally, digital health interventions have increasingly been adopted within hospital settings. Optimising their clinical implementation requires user involvement, but there is a lack of evidence regarding how this should be done. Objectives: This study was carried out to understand the acceptability and usability of a prototype Digital Antibiotic Review Tracking Toolkit and identify modifications required to optimise it ahead of a trial. Methods: The optimisation process involved online semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of fifteen healthcare professionals recruited from Scotland and England, along with three service users, to gather feedback on the prototype’s design, content and delivery. Participants’ negative views were specifically sought to identify adaptations needed to ensure that the intervention’s components aligned optimally with end-user needs. Data were analysed using Framework Analysis guided by the RE-AIM implementation science framework (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) to identify key themes. Results: Participants mostly voiced positive views regarding the prototype, finding it acceptable, feasible and engaging. They also identified concerns relating to its adoption, system functionality, accessibility and maintenance that needed to be addressed. Anticipated low adoption rates were linked to issues surrounding computer literacy. This detailed user feedback informed rapid adjustments to the intervention to enhance its acceptability, perceived future credibility and usability in hospitals. Conclusions: This novel study illustrates how to identify, modify and adapt a digital intervention quickly and efficiently using qualitative iterative methods. Findings highlight the critical importance of contextualising end-user experience with health interventions to facilitate future engagement, uptake, and long-term use. This study also demonstrates how core elements of the MRC framework can be operationalised to help refine prototype digital interventions pre-trial.
AB - Background: Internationally, digital health interventions have increasingly been adopted within hospital settings. Optimising their clinical implementation requires user involvement, but there is a lack of evidence regarding how this should be done. Objectives: This study was carried out to understand the acceptability and usability of a prototype Digital Antibiotic Review Tracking Toolkit and identify modifications required to optimise it ahead of a trial. Methods: The optimisation process involved online semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of fifteen healthcare professionals recruited from Scotland and England, along with three service users, to gather feedback on the prototype’s design, content and delivery. Participants’ negative views were specifically sought to identify adaptations needed to ensure that the intervention’s components aligned optimally with end-user needs. Data were analysed using Framework Analysis guided by the RE-AIM implementation science framework (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) to identify key themes. Results: Participants mostly voiced positive views regarding the prototype, finding it acceptable, feasible and engaging. They also identified concerns relating to its adoption, system functionality, accessibility and maintenance that needed to be addressed. Anticipated low adoption rates were linked to issues surrounding computer literacy. This detailed user feedback informed rapid adjustments to the intervention to enhance its acceptability, perceived future credibility and usability in hospitals. Conclusions: This novel study illustrates how to identify, modify and adapt a digital intervention quickly and efficiently using qualitative iterative methods. Findings highlight the critical importance of contextualising end-user experience with health interventions to facilitate future engagement, uptake, and long-term use. This study also demonstrates how core elements of the MRC framework can be operationalised to help refine prototype digital interventions pre-trial.
KW - antibiotic review
KW - antimicrobial resistance
KW - behaviour change
KW - optimisation
KW - person-centred research
KW - qualitative design
KW - user experience
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105011673945&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=105011673945&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/antibiotics14070660
DO - 10.3390/antibiotics14070660
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105011673945
VL - 14
JO - Antibiotics
JF - Antibiotics
IS - 7
M1 - 660
ER -