Environmental changes of the last three centuries indicated by siliceous microfossil records from the southwestern Baltic Sea

E Andren, Tim Brand, Graham B Shimmield

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

54 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Four short sediment cores from the southwestern Baltic Sea were analysed with respect to their content of siliceous microfossils. The aim was to detect and date changes in the composition of the diatom flora and to link these changes to variations in the anthropogenic load of nutrients during the last century. The study shows that the most significant change in the diatom assemblages occurred 130-140 years ago. The change is recorded in the sediments as a shift from periphytic diatom taxa to a predominance of planktonic taxa. This indicates that the photic layer has decreased in depth, probably due to eutrophication of the Baltic Sea, which consequently began to affect the area investigated approximately AD 1850. To support the results of a changing ratio of periphytic to planktonic diatoms, diatom accumulation rates were calculated In general, the diatom accumulation rate data show a decrease in the periphytic accumulation rates and an increase in the planktonic accumulation rates towards the sediment surface. Some indications of a colder climate are recorded in the sediments approximately 230 years ago. These results are in accordance with the record of maximum extent of sea ice in the same area and are suggested to represent a late stage in the 'Little Ice Age'.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)25-38
Number of pages14
JournalHolocene
Volume9
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1999

Keywords

  • ANOXIA
  • Geosciences, Multidisciplinary
  • Geography, Physical
  • SEDIMENT CORE
  • BACILLARIOPHYCEAE
  • ICE
  • HISTORY
  • EUTROPHICATION
  • CHESAPEAKE BAY

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Environmental changes of the last three centuries indicated by siliceous microfossil records from the southwestern Baltic Sea'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this