Engagement on risk and uncertainty–lessons from coastal regions of Fukushima Prefecture, Japan after the 2011 nuclear disaster?

Leslie Mabon, Midori Kawabe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)


This paper uses the case study of the south-east coast of Fukushima Prefecture in Japan to draw lessons for risk communication under situations of high uncertainty and conditions of varying trust. Based on an existing field of research into the social and ethical aspects of governing risks around environmental radioactivity, empirical qualitative material collected in Fukushima Prefecture over 2014 and 2015 is analysed around three key questions: who is undertaking risk communication and how they are perceived (in particular their motivations and perceived competence); what is the purpose of engagement with citizens and stakeholders on risk and uncertainty (i.e. whether it is to ‘convince’ people or allow them to come to their own informed decision); and whether risk communication may be considered responsive to the needs of the affected populations. The findings are then applied to Kasperson’s four questions for the future of risk communication in order to assess their wider implications. Particular attention is paid to how the individual or institution conveying the risk message is perceived, and in whose interests risk communication is undertaken.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1297-1312
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Risk Research
Issue number11
Publication statusPublished - 2 Nov 2018



  • environmental sociology
  • Fukushima nuclear accident
  • qualitative research
  • risk communication
  • risk governance

Cite this