Does marine planning enable progress towards adaptive governance in marine systems? Lessons from Scotland's regional marine planning process

Lucy Greenhill, T.A. Stojanovic, P. Tett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
13 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper examines marine planning in Scotland and the extent to which it constrains or enables change towards adaptive governance. An in-depth case study ofthe partnership-based regional marine planning process is presented, based on interviews and documentary analysis. Drawing on adaptive governance theory, analysis focussed on key themes of: (1) local governance and integration across scales; (2) participation and collaboration; (3) learning, innovation and adaptability; and (4) self-organization. Results present regional marine planning as an interface between hierarchical and collaborative governance based on empow- erment of regional actors and an attempt to enable coexistence of ‘top-down' arrangements with experimentation at smaller scales. In this system, national government provides legal legitimacy, economic incentives and policy oversight, while the partnerships support collaboration and innovation at the regional level, based on strong leadership and participation. Contrasting experience of partnership-working is evident between the large and complex region of the Clyde and the island region of Shetland, where devolved powers and a more cohesive and community-based stakeholder group better facilitate adaptive governance. Overall findings of the study show the tensions of institutionalizing adaptive governance and provide insights into how marine planning contributes to governance ofmarine systems. Firstly, vertical integration between central and decentralized authority in multi-level marine planning arrangements is challenged by an unclear balance ofpower and account- ability between national government and regional marine planning partnerships. Secondly, the interaction between marine planning and existing policy, planning and management emerged as critical, because marine plans may only operate as an instrument to ‘guide' management and prevailing, limited adaptive capacity in broader management structures constrains adaptive outcomes. Lastly, adaptive governance requires incremental and rapid response to change, but limited financial and technical resources constrain the depth and scale of reflection and ability to act. Understanding the contribution of marine planning requires clarification of the interaction between marine planning and other management (the extent to which it can influence decision-making in other domains) and, in addressing governance deficiencies, attention is also required on the adaptive capacity ofexisting and emerging legislative frameworks which govern decision-making and management ofactivities at sea.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages17
JournalMaritime Studies
Volume2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Mar 2020

Keywords

  • Adaptive governance
  • Local governance
  • Marine spatial planning
  • Regional marine planning
  • adaptive governance
  • and whither
  • local governance
  • marine
  • marine spatial planning
  • of the topical collection
  • on critical turn in
  • regional marine planning
  • spatial planning - whence
  • this article is part

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Does marine planning enable progress towards adaptive governance in marine systems? Lessons from Scotland's regional marine planning process'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this