Critical mountaineering decisions: technology, expertise and subjective risk in adventurous leisure

Matthew r. Groves, Peter j. Varley

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    10 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Humans have developed strategies of varying complexity to augment their probability of survival and success in complex environments. In contemporary outdoor adventure scenarios, advances in knowledge, training and technology have been adopted to make us safer, or make us feel safer. Avalanche-prone terrain is one such complex environment where uncertainty is key. A small-sample pilot study was conducted during a 3-year trial of mandatory avalanche transceiver, shovel and probe use at Glenmore Lodge, sportscotland National Outdoor Training Centre. The perceived effects that the equipment might have on participants’ risk perceptions and risk-taking behaviour were investigated through semi-structured interviews. Patterns of avalanche risk perception and relationship with the safety equipment varied strongly between expertise levels, and a discrepancy between declared risk behaviour and action, demonstrations of optimistic bias and defensive denial were evident. Wider implications are suggested regarding subjective relationships with both risk and technology in adventure settings and, in our leisure more generally.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)706-720
    JournalLeisure Studies
    Volume39
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2 Sept 2020

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Critical mountaineering decisions: technology, expertise and subjective risk in adventurous leisure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this