Conservation practice could benefit from routine testing and publication of management outcomes

William J. Sutherland; Roger Mitchell; Jessica Walsh; Tatsuya Amano; Malcolm Ausden; Trevor J.C. Beebee; David Bullock; Mike Daniels; James Deutsch; Richard A. Griffiths; Stephanie V. Prior; Tony Whitten; Lynn V. Dicks

Conservation practice could benefit from routine testing and publication of management outcomes

William J. Sutherland, Roger Mitchell, Jessica Walsh, Tatsuya Amano, Malcolm Ausden, Trevor J.C. Beebee, David Bullock, Mike Daniels, James Deutsch, Richard A. Griffiths, Stephanie V. Prior, Tony Whitten, Lynn V. Dicks

Centre for Mountain Studies

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Effective conservation requires a step change in the way practitioners can contribute to science and can have access to research outputs. The journal Conservation Evidence was established in 2004 to help practitioners surmount several obstacles they face when attempting to document the effects of their conservation actions scientifically. It is easily and freely accessible online. It is free to publish in and it enables global communication of the effects of practical trials and experiments, which are virtually impossible to get published in most scientific journals. The driving force behind Conservation Evidence is the need to generate and share scientific information about the effects of interventions.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1-3
Number of pages	3
Journal	Conservation Evidence
Volume	10
Publication status	Published - 2013

Handle.net

Persistent link

Cite this

@article{00830b3110f24b79a70de34a20cf1588,

title = "Conservation practice could benefit from routine testing and publication of management outcomes",

abstract = "Effective conservation requires a step change in the way practitioners can contribute to science and can have access to research outputs. The journal Conservation Evidence was established in 2004 to help practitioners surmount several obstacles they face when attempting to document the effects of their conservation actions scientifically. It is easily and freely accessible online. It is free to publish in and it enables global communication of the effects of practical trials and experiments, which are virtually impossible to get published in most scientific journals. The driving force behind Conservation Evidence is the need to generate and share scientific information about the effects of interventions.",

author = "Sutherland, {William J.} and Roger Mitchell and Jessica Walsh and Tatsuya Amano and Malcolm Ausden and Beebee, {Trevor J.C.} and David Bullock and Mike Daniels and James Deutsch and Griffiths, {Richard A.} and Prior, {Stephanie V.} and Tony Whitten and Dicks, {Lynn V.}",

year = "2013",

language = "English",

volume = "10",

pages = "1--3",

journal = "Conservation Evidence",

issn = "1758-2067",

publisher = "University of Cambridge",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conservation practice could benefit from routine testing and publication of management outcomes

AU - Sutherland, William J.

AU - Mitchell, Roger

AU - Walsh, Jessica

AU - Amano, Tatsuya

AU - Ausden, Malcolm

AU - Beebee, Trevor J.C.

AU - Bullock, David

AU - Daniels, Mike

AU - Deutsch, James

AU - Griffiths, Richard A.

AU - Prior, Stephanie V.

AU - Whitten, Tony

AU - Dicks, Lynn V.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Effective conservation requires a step change in the way practitioners can contribute to science and can have access to research outputs. The journal Conservation Evidence was established in 2004 to help practitioners surmount several obstacles they face when attempting to document the effects of their conservation actions scientifically. It is easily and freely accessible online. It is free to publish in and it enables global communication of the effects of practical trials and experiments, which are virtually impossible to get published in most scientific journals. The driving force behind Conservation Evidence is the need to generate and share scientific information about the effects of interventions.

AB - Effective conservation requires a step change in the way practitioners can contribute to science and can have access to research outputs. The journal Conservation Evidence was established in 2004 to help practitioners surmount several obstacles they face when attempting to document the effects of their conservation actions scientifically. It is easily and freely accessible online. It is free to publish in and it enables global communication of the effects of practical trials and experiments, which are virtually impossible to get published in most scientific journals. The driving force behind Conservation Evidence is the need to generate and share scientific information about the effects of interventions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877701082&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84877701082&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84877701082

SN - 1758-2067

VL - 10

SP - 1

EP - 3

JO - Conservation Evidence

JF - Conservation Evidence

ER -

Conservation practice could benefit from routine testing and publication of management outcomes

Abstract

Handle.net

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this