Capturing complexity: field testing the use of 'structure from motion' derived virtual models to replicate standard measures of reef structure

Dan Bayley, Andrew Mogg, Heather Koldewey, Andy Purvis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Reef structural complexity provides important refuge habitat for a range of marine organisms, and is a useful indicator of the health and resilience of reefs as a whole. Marine scientists have recently begun to use ‘Structure from Motion’ (SfM) photogrammetry in order to accurately and repeatably capture the 3D structure of physical objects underwater, including reefs. There has however been limited research on the comparability of this new method with existing analogue methods already used widely for measuring and monitoring 3D structure, such as ‘tape and chain rugosity index (RI)’ and graded visual assessments. Our findings show thatanalogueandSfMRIcanbereliablyconvertedoverastandard10-mreefsection (SfM RI = 1.348 chain RI—0.359, r2 = 0.82; and Chain RI = 0.606 SfM RI + 0.465) for RI values up to 2.0, however, SfM RI values above this number become increasingly divergent from traditional tape and chain measurements. Additionally we found SfM RI correlates well with visual assessment grades of coral reef over a 10 10 m area (SfM RI = 0.1461 visual grade + 1.117; r2 = 0.83). The SfM method is shown to be affordable and non-destructive whilst also allowing the data collected to be archival, less biased by the observer, and broader in its scope of applications than standard methods. This work allows researchers to easily transition from analogue to digital structural assessment techniques, facilitating continued long-term monitoring, whilst also improving the quality and additional research value of the data collected.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages17
JournalPeerJ
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Mar 2019

Fingerprint

Reefs
reefs
Testing
Tapes
testing
Photogrammetry
Monitoring
photogrammetry
methodology
monitoring
refuge habitats
Coral Reefs
coral reefs
Health
Aquatic Organisms
researchers
Research
Ecosystem
organisms
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • structure
  • Monitoring
  • complexity
  • Reef
  • Photogammetry
  • Imaging

Cite this

@article{34a08e36edab492283174ebe62d60858,
title = "Capturing complexity:: field testing the use of 'structure from motion' derived virtual models to replicate standard measures of reef structure",
abstract = "Reef structural complexity provides important refuge habitat for a range of marine organisms, and is a useful indicator of the health and resilience of reefs as a whole. Marine scientists have recently begun to use ‘Structure from Motion’ (SfM) photogrammetry in order to accurately and repeatably capture the 3D structure of physical objects underwater, including reefs. There has however been limited research on the comparability of this new method with existing analogue methods already used widely for measuring and monitoring 3D structure, such as ‘tape and chain rugosity index (RI)’ and graded visual assessments. Our findings show thatanalogueandSfMRIcanbereliablyconvertedoverastandard10-mreefsection (SfM RI = 1.348 chain RI—0.359, r2 = 0.82; and Chain RI = 0.606 SfM RI + 0.465) for RI values up to 2.0, however, SfM RI values above this number become increasingly divergent from traditional tape and chain measurements. Additionally we found SfM RI correlates well with visual assessment grades of coral reef over a 10 10 m area (SfM RI = 0.1461 visual grade + 1.117; r2 = 0.83). The SfM method is shown to be affordable and non-destructive whilst also allowing the data collected to be archival, less biased by the observer, and broader in its scope of applications than standard methods. This work allows researchers to easily transition from analogue to digital structural assessment techniques, facilitating continued long-term monitoring, whilst also improving the quality and additional research value of the data collected.",
keywords = "structure, Monitoring, complexity, Reef, Photogammetry, Imaging",
author = "Dan Bayley and Andrew Mogg and Heather Koldewey and Andy Purvis",
note = "Copyright 2019 Bayley et al",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "4",
doi = "http://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6540",
language = "English",
journal = "PeerJ",
issn = "2167-8359",
publisher = "PeerJ",

}

Capturing complexity: field testing the use of 'structure from motion' derived virtual models to replicate standard measures of reef structure. / Bayley, Dan ; Mogg, Andrew; Koldewey, Heather; Purvis, Andy.

In: PeerJ, 04.03.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Capturing complexity:

T2 - field testing the use of 'structure from motion' derived virtual models to replicate standard measures of reef structure

AU - Bayley, Dan

AU - Mogg, Andrew

AU - Koldewey, Heather

AU - Purvis, Andy

N1 - Copyright 2019 Bayley et al

PY - 2019/3/4

Y1 - 2019/3/4

N2 - Reef structural complexity provides important refuge habitat for a range of marine organisms, and is a useful indicator of the health and resilience of reefs as a whole. Marine scientists have recently begun to use ‘Structure from Motion’ (SfM) photogrammetry in order to accurately and repeatably capture the 3D structure of physical objects underwater, including reefs. There has however been limited research on the comparability of this new method with existing analogue methods already used widely for measuring and monitoring 3D structure, such as ‘tape and chain rugosity index (RI)’ and graded visual assessments. Our findings show thatanalogueandSfMRIcanbereliablyconvertedoverastandard10-mreefsection (SfM RI = 1.348 chain RI—0.359, r2 = 0.82; and Chain RI = 0.606 SfM RI + 0.465) for RI values up to 2.0, however, SfM RI values above this number become increasingly divergent from traditional tape and chain measurements. Additionally we found SfM RI correlates well with visual assessment grades of coral reef over a 10 10 m area (SfM RI = 0.1461 visual grade + 1.117; r2 = 0.83). The SfM method is shown to be affordable and non-destructive whilst also allowing the data collected to be archival, less biased by the observer, and broader in its scope of applications than standard methods. This work allows researchers to easily transition from analogue to digital structural assessment techniques, facilitating continued long-term monitoring, whilst also improving the quality and additional research value of the data collected.

AB - Reef structural complexity provides important refuge habitat for a range of marine organisms, and is a useful indicator of the health and resilience of reefs as a whole. Marine scientists have recently begun to use ‘Structure from Motion’ (SfM) photogrammetry in order to accurately and repeatably capture the 3D structure of physical objects underwater, including reefs. There has however been limited research on the comparability of this new method with existing analogue methods already used widely for measuring and monitoring 3D structure, such as ‘tape and chain rugosity index (RI)’ and graded visual assessments. Our findings show thatanalogueandSfMRIcanbereliablyconvertedoverastandard10-mreefsection (SfM RI = 1.348 chain RI—0.359, r2 = 0.82; and Chain RI = 0.606 SfM RI + 0.465) for RI values up to 2.0, however, SfM RI values above this number become increasingly divergent from traditional tape and chain measurements. Additionally we found SfM RI correlates well with visual assessment grades of coral reef over a 10 10 m area (SfM RI = 0.1461 visual grade + 1.117; r2 = 0.83). The SfM method is shown to be affordable and non-destructive whilst also allowing the data collected to be archival, less biased by the observer, and broader in its scope of applications than standard methods. This work allows researchers to easily transition from analogue to digital structural assessment techniques, facilitating continued long-term monitoring, whilst also improving the quality and additional research value of the data collected.

KW - structure

KW - Monitoring

KW - complexity

KW - Reef

KW - Photogammetry

KW - Imaging

U2 - http://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6540

DO - http://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6540

M3 - Article

JO - PeerJ

JF - PeerJ

SN - 2167-8359

ER -