TY - JOUR
T1 - Binocular vision and foraging in ducks, geese and swans (Anatidae)
AU - Cantlay, Jennifer C.
AU - Martin, Graham R.
AU - McClelland, Stephanie C.
AU - Potier, Simon
AU - O'Brien, Michelle F.
AU - Fernández-Juricic, Esteban
AU - Bond, Alexander L.
AU - Portugal, Steven J.
N1 - © 2023 The Authors.
Funding Information:
J.C.C. was a London NERC Doctoral Training Partnership candidate, funded by the Natural Environment Research Council (grant no. NE/L002485/1) and has CASE partnership funding from the RSPB. Acknowledgements
PY - 2023/9/6
Y1 - 2023/9/6
N2 - Wide variation in visual field configuration across avian species is hypothesized to be driven primarily by foraging ecology and predator detection. While some studies of selected taxa have identified relationships between foraging ecology and binocular field characteristics in particular species, few have accounted for the relevance of shared ancestry. We conducted a large-scale, comparative analysis across 39 Anatidae species to investigate the relationship between the foraging ecology traits of diet or behaviour and binocular field parameters, while controlling for phylogeny. We used phylogenetic models to examine correlations between traits and binocular field characteristics, using unidimensional and morphometric approaches. We found that foraging behaviour influenced three parameters of binocular field size: maximum binocular field width, vertical binocular field extent, and angular separation between the eye-bill projection and the direction of maximum binocular field width. Foraging behaviour and body mass each influenced two descriptors of binocular field shape. Phylogenetic relatedness had minimal influence on binocular field size and shape, apart from vertical binocular field extent. Binocular field differences are associated with specific foraging behaviours, as related to the perceptual challenges of obtaining different food items from aquatic and terrestrial environments.
AB - Wide variation in visual field configuration across avian species is hypothesized to be driven primarily by foraging ecology and predator detection. While some studies of selected taxa have identified relationships between foraging ecology and binocular field characteristics in particular species, few have accounted for the relevance of shared ancestry. We conducted a large-scale, comparative analysis across 39 Anatidae species to investigate the relationship between the foraging ecology traits of diet or behaviour and binocular field parameters, while controlling for phylogeny. We used phylogenetic models to examine correlations between traits and binocular field characteristics, using unidimensional and morphometric approaches. We found that foraging behaviour influenced three parameters of binocular field size: maximum binocular field width, vertical binocular field extent, and angular separation between the eye-bill projection and the direction of maximum binocular field width. Foraging behaviour and body mass each influenced two descriptors of binocular field shape. Phylogenetic relatedness had minimal influence on binocular field size and shape, apart from vertical binocular field extent. Binocular field differences are associated with specific foraging behaviours, as related to the perceptual challenges of obtaining different food items from aquatic and terrestrial environments.
KW - Anatidae
KW - binocularity
KW - blind area
KW - ophthalmoscope
KW - visual fields
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85169766394&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85169766394&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1098/rspb.2023.1213
DO - 10.1098/rspb.2023.1213
M3 - Article
C2 - 37670586
AN - SCOPUS:85169766394
SN - 0962-8452
VL - 290
JO - Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
JF - Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
IS - 2006
M1 - 20231213
ER -