TY - JOUR
T1 - At the Limits of Cultural Heritage Rights? the Glasgow Bajuni Campaign and the UK Immigration System
T2 - A Case Study
AU - Hill, Emma C.
AU - Craith, Máiréad Nic
AU - Clopot, Cristina
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © International Cultural Property Society 2018.
PY - 2018/2/14
Y1 - 2018/2/14
N2 - In 2003, the Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage (UNESCO ICH Convention) formalized provision for forms of heritage not solely rooted in the material world. This expanded the scope and accessibility of cultural heritage rights for communities and groups. To much commentary and critique, the United Kingdom (UK) infamously decided not to ratify the UNESCO ICH Convention. This article examines the implications of the UK's decision not to ratify the Convention for the cultural heritage and human rights of an asylum-seeking group in Glasgow, Scotland, namely, the Glasgow Bajuni campaigners, members of a minority Somali clan. Based on participatory ethnographic fieldwork with the group and analysis of their asylum cases, this article makes two observations: first, that the UK's absence from the Convention establishes a precedent in which other state actors (that is, immigration authorities) are emboldened to advance skepticism over matters involving intangible cultural heritage and, second, that despite this, limitations in current provisions in the UNESCO ICH Convention would provide the group with little additional protection than they currently have. Developing these observations, we critique current UK approaches to intangible cultural heritage as complicit in the maintenance of hierarchies and the border. Finally, we consider the extent to which the current provisions of the UNESCO ICH Convention might be improved to include migrant and asylum-seeking groups.
AB - In 2003, the Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage (UNESCO ICH Convention) formalized provision for forms of heritage not solely rooted in the material world. This expanded the scope and accessibility of cultural heritage rights for communities and groups. To much commentary and critique, the United Kingdom (UK) infamously decided not to ratify the UNESCO ICH Convention. This article examines the implications of the UK's decision not to ratify the Convention for the cultural heritage and human rights of an asylum-seeking group in Glasgow, Scotland, namely, the Glasgow Bajuni campaigners, members of a minority Somali clan. Based on participatory ethnographic fieldwork with the group and analysis of their asylum cases, this article makes two observations: first, that the UK's absence from the Convention establishes a precedent in which other state actors (that is, immigration authorities) are emboldened to advance skepticism over matters involving intangible cultural heritage and, second, that despite this, limitations in current provisions in the UNESCO ICH Convention would provide the group with little additional protection than they currently have. Developing these observations, we critique current UK approaches to intangible cultural heritage as complicit in the maintenance of hierarchies and the border. Finally, we consider the extent to which the current provisions of the UNESCO ICH Convention might be improved to include migrant and asylum-seeking groups.
KW - asylum seekers
KW - Bajuni
KW - cultural rights
KW - human rights
KW - immigration
KW - intangible cultural heritage
KW - Somali
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044245887&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044245887&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S0940739118000024
DO - 10.1017/S0940739118000024
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85044245887
SN - 0940-7391
VL - 25
SP - 35
EP - 58
JO - International Journal of Cultural Property
JF - International Journal of Cultural Property
IS - 1
ER -