TY - JOUR
T1 - Arctic corridors and northern voices project
T2 - Methods for community-based participatory mapping for low impact shipping corridors in Arctic Canada
AU - Dawson, Jackie
AU - Carter, Natalie Ann
AU - van Luijk, Nicolien
AU - Weber, Melissa
AU - Cook, Alison
N1 - © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
This is an open access article under the CC BY license
The author was not affiliated to SAMS at the time of publication
Funding Information:
The authors recognize the participation of the research participants as well as the contributions made by the community research associates and partners: Jessi Pascal (Aklavik); Jimmy Napayok, Hunter Tattuinee, Kukik Baker; Shirley Tagalik (Arviat); Pamela Akhok, Colin Crockatt, Francis Emingak, Takpak Klengenberg, Shawn Marriott, and Jasmine Tiktalek (Cambridge Bay); Jupie Angootealuk, Mark Eetuk, Chantel Emikaut, Lenny Emiktaut, Joe Pingwartuk, Adamie Nakoolak, and Bobbie Saviakjuk (Coral Harbour); Karen Aaluk, Candace Eleehetook, Ikey Kogvek, Nicole Kununak, Edward Nuliayok, Breanna Pooyatak, Charlene Porter, Gibson Porter, Gina Porter, Johnny Porter, Cory Putuguq, Alaira Sallerina, Brad Tiriraniaq, Brett Tiriraniaq (Gjoa Haven); Okalik Eegeesiak, Chantel Emiktaut, Lenny Emiktaut, Geneva Noble, Cynthia Pialaq, and Eelai Uniuqsaraq (Iqaluit); Andrew Arreak, Eleanore Arreak-Pitseolak, Cara Killiktee, Brian Koonoo, Justin Milton, Michael Milton, Jimmy Pitseolak, Jonathan Pitseolak, Natasha Simonee, Rachel Smale (Pond Inlet); P.J. Attagootak, Aasta Idlout, Sophie Idlout, Tatiana McDonald, Jushua Atagootak, and Tommy Salluviniq (Resolute Bay); Eva Audlaluk, Ken Cameron, Amanda Ikey, Belinda Ikey, Bobby Novalinga, Mary Papigatuk, and Stella Sakiagak (Salluit). The authors appreciate the collaborative efforts of the following community organizations and partners: Aklavik, Inuvik, Sachs Harbour, Paulatuk, Tuktoyaktuk and Olokhaktomiut/Ulukhaktok Hunters' and Trappers' Committees and Community Corporations; Aiviit, Arviat, Ekaluktutiak, Gjoa Haven, Amaruq, Mittimatalik, and Resolute Bay Hunters' and Trappers' Organizations/Associations; Arviat, Cambridge Bay, Gjoa Haven, Pond Inlet, and Resolute Bay Hamlet Offices/Councils; Nassivik, Qiqirtaq and Qarmartalik Schools; Arviat Aqqiumavvik and Haqihaqtiit Societies; Ikaarvik:Barriers to Bridges Program; Inuvialuit Game Council; Betty and Sammy Kogvik; the Northern Village of Salluit Office, and Barbara Papigtuk. The authors appreciate the technical and general in-kind support provided by Annika Ogilvie, Canadian Coast Guard, Canadian Hydrographic Service, Carleton University, Dalhousie University, Government of Nunavut, Jenna Joyce, Katari Imaging, Kivalliq Inuit Association, Nunavut Arctic College, Nunavut Research Institute, Oceans North, Parks Canada, Polar Knowledge Canada, Qikiqtani Inuit Association, SmartICE, Transport Canada, uOttawa Geographic, Statistical and Government Information Centre, uOttawa Department of Geography, Environment, and Geomatics, and University of the Sunshine Coast. The authors are grateful for the financial support for the conduct of this research provided by ArcticNet, Clear Seas, Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO), Irving Ship Building Inc. Marine Environment Observation Prediction and Response Network (MEOPAR), Northern Scientific Training Program, Nunavut Arctic College, Nunavut General Monitoring Program (NGMP), Nunavut Research Institute, Oceans North, Pew Charitable Trusts, Students for Canada's North, the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) of Canada, and WWF-Canada.
Funding Information:
The authors are grateful for the financial support for the conduct of this research provided by ArcticNet, Clear Seas, Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO), Irving Ship Building Inc., Marine Environment Observation Prediction and Response Network (MEOPAR), Northern Scientific Training Program, Nunavut Arctic College, Nunavut General Monitoring Program (NGMP), Nunavut Research Institute, Oceans North, Pew Charitable Trusts, Students for Canada's North, the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) of Canada, and WWF-Canada.
PY - 2020/9/12
Y1 - 2020/9/12
N2 - Documenting Inuit and local knowledge is critical to its consideration within policy discussions around Arctic shipping; especially considering the rapid increase in ship traffic due to reductions in sea ice and climate change. We present our unique community-based research approach which incorporated youth training, participatory mapping, qualitative focus group discussions, and verification exercises to document Inuit communities’ perspectives in Arctic Canada about Low Impact Shipping Corridors. These qualitative activities provided appropriate context and understanding around community-created maps, community-identified opportunities, concerns, and recommendations, and the policy relevance and feasibility of recommendations posed. Three activity phases were employed; 1) before engaging in in-community research, 2) during in-community research, and 3) after completing in-community research. Spatial and non-spatial data were analyzed using ArcGIS® and NVivo software, respectively. These methods and observations can inform future research initiatives, particularly transdisciplinary teams, including those involving southern-based (early career) researchers, working in Inuit Nunangat. • Methods presented here ensured that scientific processes and outputs were robust and rigorous and research was conducted in a respectful, reciprocal manner. • Only through the collaborative efforts of a transdisciplinary team could scientific rigour be attained and respect be afforded. • The approach can be easily applied to document community members’ perspectives on local priorities.
AB - Documenting Inuit and local knowledge is critical to its consideration within policy discussions around Arctic shipping; especially considering the rapid increase in ship traffic due to reductions in sea ice and climate change. We present our unique community-based research approach which incorporated youth training, participatory mapping, qualitative focus group discussions, and verification exercises to document Inuit communities’ perspectives in Arctic Canada about Low Impact Shipping Corridors. These qualitative activities provided appropriate context and understanding around community-created maps, community-identified opportunities, concerns, and recommendations, and the policy relevance and feasibility of recommendations posed. Three activity phases were employed; 1) before engaging in in-community research, 2) during in-community research, and 3) after completing in-community research. Spatial and non-spatial data were analyzed using ArcGIS® and NVivo software, respectively. These methods and observations can inform future research initiatives, particularly transdisciplinary teams, including those involving southern-based (early career) researchers, working in Inuit Nunangat. • Methods presented here ensured that scientific processes and outputs were robust and rigorous and research was conducted in a respectful, reciprocal manner. • Only through the collaborative efforts of a transdisciplinary team could scientific rigour be attained and respect be afforded. • The approach can be easily applied to document community members’ perspectives on local priorities.
KW - Arctic
KW - Community-based research
KW - Community-based research and participatory mapping
KW - Local and Inuit knowledge
KW - Low impact shipping corridors
KW - Participatory mapping
KW - Youth engagement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85091673459&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85091673459&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.mex.2020.101064
DO - 10.1016/j.mex.2020.101064
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85091673459
SN - 2215-0161
VL - 7
JO - MethodsX
JF - MethodsX
M1 - 101064
ER -