A reconciliation of empirical and mechanistic models of the air-sea gas transfer velocity

Lonneke Goddijn-Murphy, David Woolf, Adrian H. Callaghan, Philip D. Nightingale, Jamie D. Shutler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)
43 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Models of the air-sea transfer velocity of gases may be either empirical or mechanistic. Extrapolations of empirical models to an unmeasured gas or to another water temperature can be erroneous if the basis of that extrapolation is flawed. This issue is readily demonstrated for the most well-known empirical gas transfer velocity models where the influence of bubble-mediated transfer, which can vary between gases, is not explicitly accounted for. Mechanistic models are hindered by an incomplete knowledge of the mechanisms of air-sea
gas transfer. We describe a hybrid model that incorporates a simple mechanistic view – strictly enforcing a distinction between direct and bubble-mediated transfer – but also uses parameterizations based on data from eddy flux measurements of dimethyl sulphide (DMS) to calibrate the model together with dual tracer results to evaluate the model. This model underpins simple algorithms that can be easily applied within schemes to calculate local,
regional or global air-sea fluxes of gases.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Geophysical Research-Oceans
Early online date5 Jan 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Feb 2016

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A reconciliation of empirical and mechanistic models of the air-sea gas transfer velocity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this