Reply to the discussion on ‘A 2.3 Million Year Lacustrine Record of Orbital Forcing from the Devonian of Northern Scotland’, Journal of the Geological Society, London 173, 474–488

SD Andrews; DG Cornwell; NH Trewin; AJ Hartley; SG Archer

doi:10.1144/jgs2017-132

Reply to the discussion on ‘A 2.3 Million Year Lacustrine Record of Orbital Forcing from the Devonian of Northern Scotland’, Journal of the Geological Society, London 173, 474–488

SD Andrews
, DG Cornwell
, NH Trewin
, AJ Hartley
, SG Archer

UHI Inverness

Publikation: Article › Begutachtung

3 Zitate (Scopus)

Abstract

Smith & Bailey (2017a) have raised concerns over the methodologies we applied for time series analysis in our study of the cyclic Devonian lacustrine deposits of northern Scotland (Andrews et al. 2016). Similar concerns have been raised on a number of occasions for similar studies (Bailey et al. 2009 on Kemp & Coe 2007; Smith & Bailey 2017c on Howe et al. 2016; Smith et al. …

Originalsprache	English
Seiten (von - bis)	478-488
Seitenumfang	10
Fachzeitschrift	Journal of the Geological Society-London
Jahrgang	173
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2017-132
Publikationsstatus	Published - 1 Dez. 2017

Zugriff auf Dokument

10.1144/jgs2017-132Lizenz: Unspecified

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Reply to the discussion on ‘A 2.3 Million Year Lacustrine Record of Orbital Forcing from the Devonian of Northern Scotland’, Journal of the Geological Society, London 173, 474–488“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Dieses zitieren

@article{c3009bed4e1a4a14be7e9dbc82ed644c,

title = "Reply to the discussion on {\textquoteleft}A 2.3 Million Year Lacustrine Record of Orbital Forcing from the Devonian of Northern Scotland{\textquoteright}, Journal of the Geological Society, London 173, 474–488",

abstract = "Smith \& Bailey (2017a) have raised concerns over the methodologies we applied for time series analysis in our study of the cyclic Devonian lacustrine deposits of northern Scotland (Andrews et al. 2016). Similar concerns have been raised on a number of occasions for similar studies (Bailey et al. 2009 on Kemp \& Coe 2007; Smith \& Bailey 2017c on Howe et al. 2016; Smith et al. …",

author = "SD Andrews and DG Cornwell and NH Trewin and AJ Hartley and SG Archer",

note = "Output produced while at University of Aberdeen - full text version available from UoA repository.",

year = "2017",

month = dec,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1144/jgs2017-132",

language = "English",

volume = "173",

pages = "478--488",

journal = "Journal of the Geological Society-London",

issn = "0016-7649",

publisher = "Geological Society of London",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply to the discussion on ‘A 2.3 Million Year Lacustrine Record of Orbital Forcing from the Devonian of Northern Scotland’, Journal of the Geological Society, London 173, 474–488

AU - Andrews, SD

AU - Cornwell, DG

AU - Trewin, NH

AU - Hartley, AJ

AU - Archer, SG

N1 - Output produced while at University of Aberdeen - full text version available from UoA repository.

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - Smith & Bailey (2017a) have raised concerns over the methodologies we applied for time series analysis in our study of the cyclic Devonian lacustrine deposits of northern Scotland (Andrews et al. 2016). Similar concerns have been raised on a number of occasions for similar studies (Bailey et al. 2009 on Kemp & Coe 2007; Smith & Bailey 2017c on Howe et al. 2016; Smith et al. …

AB - Smith & Bailey (2017a) have raised concerns over the methodologies we applied for time series analysis in our study of the cyclic Devonian lacustrine deposits of northern Scotland (Andrews et al. 2016). Similar concerns have been raised on a number of occasions for similar studies (Bailey et al. 2009 on Kemp & Coe 2007; Smith & Bailey 2017c on Howe et al. 2016; Smith et al. …

U2 - 10.1144/jgs2017-132

DO - 10.1144/jgs2017-132

M3 - Article

SN - 0016-7649

VL - 173

SP - 478

EP - 488

JO - Journal of the Geological Society-London

JF - Journal of the Geological Society-London

ER -